If you’re curious to know what the most relevant differences are between the XF10 and its direct competitor, the Ricoh GR mark II, you’ve come to the right place. On the GR you have to rely on the top dial which isn’t as precise. The sensor used for the X-A5 is the same one found inside the XF10. The XF10 also features a function ring on the lens which can be useful for different things such as manual focusing. XF10: 112.5mm x 64.4mm x 41.0mm, 279g Both Ricoh GR III and Fujifilm XF10 have APS-C sized 24.0 MP resolution sensors so sensor size and resolution is not a differentiator between these two cameras. Find out where the XF10 wins! Published July 20, 2018 By Mathieu Filed Under: Preview Tagged With: Preview. There is a 3 year gap between Ricoh GR II (2015) and Fujifilm XF10 (2018). On the other hand, Fujifilm XF10 has a 24.0MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor . 16 MP The Ricoh camera is larger in terms of width by approximately half a centimetre but is also slightly lighter and not as deep as the Fuji. 91 vs 9; Ricoh GR vs Fuji XF10? | APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor, 24 MP Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. Comparison points: 1. Try to use the simplest tool possible for the job. Both present similar 28mm F2.8 equivalent lenses but the XF10’s is updated to be even more compact and yes, much faster in performance down to even tracking moving subjects. Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm XF10: Sensor Comparison. GR II sensor is slightly bigger than XF10 sensor (only 0.4% difference). It has a higher Overall Score and beats Ricoh GR II in all criteria except one: Portability.If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Ricoh GR II. In bulb mode, the XF10 can keep the shutter open as long as 60 minutes: otherwise the slowest speed available is 30s. It’s very useful for capturing quick moments when doing street photography or reportage. Ricoh GR II is 28g lighter than the Fujifilm XF10 but we don't think this will make a significant difference. It's end of 2019. The two cameras have a number of things in common including bracketing, multiple exposure, time-lapse and RAW processing. Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3". The XF10, on the other hand, has built in flash (with no external shoe), a non-retracting lens, and a minimum focusing distance of 10cm. Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices, Connect your camera to other devices via Blueetooth, Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR, Remote control your camera with a smartphone. The Fujifilm XF10 and the Ricoh GR II are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in July 2018 and June 2015. 95. https://bestmirrorlessblogs.com/comparisons/fujifilm-x70-vs-ricoh-gr-ii To set the record straight, the XF10 is even smaller than the X70 with both sporting an APSC-sized sensor but the XF10’s a Bayer sensor vs X70’s X-Trans II sensor. Also, like the XF10, the GRIII has a 18.5mm f2.8 lens (28mm f4.2 equivalent), but unlike the XF10, the Ricoh has a built in ND filter. The two cameras in question are the Ricoh GR III which currently retails at $889.95 and the Fujifilm XF10 which nearly halves that price at $449. Both cameras have APS-C sensors but Ricoh GR II has a 16.0 MP and Fujifilm XF10 has a 24.0 MP resolution. For many years, the Ricoh GR was something of a lone ranger in the premium compact category, being the only model to feature a 16MP APS-C sized sensor and a fixed 28mm equivalent lens along with the Nikon Coolpix A. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Our comparison table below covers all the important specifications of each camera. Image; Fujifilm XF10 Ricoh GR II; ISO: 100, 200, 12800, 25600, 51200: 100, 25600: ISO minimum: 100: 100: ISO maximum Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3". Main concern is possible dust in older camera or possible problems with retractable lens. Given the recognition of the GR collection, it comes as little shock that Fujifilm has designed the XF10 to look similar to the GR II. You may also be interested in these comparisons: Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR II Ricoh GR III vs Fujifilm XF10. Its body is 1mm narrower, 3mm shorter and 6mm thinner than Fujifilm XF10. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. 60 points. As you can see, GR II is 3 years older than XF10. Snapsort compares the Fujifilm XF10 vs the Ricoh GR II to find out which is the winner. It allows you to maintain a constant connection with your smart device without consuming as much battery power and you can transfer images automatically while using the camera. You can set the autofocus to a specific focus distance (1m, 1.5m, 2m, 2.5m, 5m or infinity) and the camera will tell you how deep your depth of field is depending on the aperture you select. Ethics statement: The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications and our personal experience with the GR II. With the GR II however, you can buy the special Ricoh GH-3 lens hood and adapter that also allows you to mount 49mm circular filter, the GW-3 wide angle conversion lens (21mm equivalent) or GM-1 Macro conversion lens. Got the Fuji X70. If you don’t have a point and shoot camera yet, buy a RICOH GR II instead (ergonomics and user interface are still superior) If you don’t have RICOH GR II, but like the Fujifilm system, get XF10. In addition to being able to take a shot, move the focus point or swipe through your images, you can also flick in four different directions to activate four different functions, which is a substitute for the classic 4-way pad. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II – The 10 Main Differences on Mirrorless Cameras curated by Heather Broster To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Looking for a Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm X70 comparison? The GR II has never received much praise for its video capabilities. Key differences include: touch screen, autofocus, external mic jack, external flash and true resolution Fujifilm XF10 vs. Leica C-Lux vs. Nikon Coolpix A vs. Fujifilm FinePix X100F vs. Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX60: Pentax Ricoh GR II vs. Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX60 vs. Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs. Leica Q vs. Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II This factor shouldn’t scare you away if everything else about the Fujifilm fits your needs. With the XF10, Fujifilm is chasing the GR market more than it did back in 2016 when the X70 was announced. The GR has a built-in ND filter that provides 2 stops of compensation. The GR II doesn’t have a touch screen. Shooting with this camera and thinking about photography some more, it is a good reminder: The best standalone camera is a compact, point and shoot camera. Fujifilm added a similar feature to the XF10 called Snapshot: you can choose between 1m and f/8 or 5m and f/5.6. The GR II has some powerful black and white presets that give you a distinctive look that differs from the standard monochrome modes of digital cameras, and it’s another reason why the Ricoh is so popular. It can do 1080p at 30fps but we didn’t find the quality great due to visible aliasing and a lack in sharpness. Also I like the stealthy look of the GR more, people around you probably think it is a standard little digital cam. It can be useful for star trails or light painting. That being said, we found it reliable in S-AF as long as there is enough light and the subject isn’t moving too fast. But seems it’s a soft lens? ... Fujifilm x70 and XF10 vs GR In reply to ktmei ... GR II if you want Ricoh III but a lower price; None of the above if you don't need pocketability or want a zoom. The maximum speed is 1/4000s. Unfortunately, it also has a couple of other similarities to the Fuji XF10: mediocre battery life, and underwhelming autofocus. The latter has better buffer capabilities with a rating of 999 frames in JPG versus only 13 on the XF10. The XF10 can record 4K albeit at a disappointing frame rate of just 15fps. Ricoh GR II $ 639. The price of the Fuji camera is definitely competitive but the GR II is an older model which means you may find special offers or second-hand copies at a better price. When we tested the II version a couple of years ago, we found it surprisingly fun to use for street photography and very rewarding as far as image quality and user experience are concerned. Good image quality. Finally as you will have noticed from some product shots in this article, the XF10 comes in black or beige (champagne gold as Fuji calls it). Viewed from the top we can see that the Ricoh has a larger front grip while the XF10 lacks a hot-shoe. 4.79 µm 3.9 µm Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas. The GR II’s minimum shutter speed is 300s (excluding Bulb). There is also the Ricoh GR II, which comes in at just $550, however, it has a much older 16-megapixel sensor The GR II uses a contrast detection AF with 9 contrast detection points. Ricoh GR II has a 16.0MP APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features GR Engine V processor. 82 more focus points? Let’s compare the Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Why is Fujifilm XF10 better than Ricoh GR II? Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10. On the XF10 the image keeps the 24MP resolution thanks to an upsampling processing so it works with JPG only. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! The XF10 comes with a native sensitivity range of 200 to 12800 ISO, while extended levels expand it to 51200 on the high end and 100 ISO on the low end. Thank you! 2. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference. You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison. The Fuji doesnt have that. We found the images quite usable up to 6400 or even 12800 if you are happy to accept some noise. Both LCDs are fixed and can’t be tilted. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. The only value you can change while recording is exposure compensation. The function on the Ricoh works at a lower resolution than the native 16MP but you can save the original RAW file too. Here is a summary of how Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 scores compare: Fujifilm XF10 is the overall winner of this comparison. The GR II is less expensive and supports NFC. Fujifilm X100V vs Ricoh GR III. Great for cropping. | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor. XF10 and RICOH GR II. The competitive price puts it at an advantage but we’ll have to see how it performs before we can give a definitive verdict. Both cameras use a leaf shutter mechanism that is quieter than focal plane shutters and allows you to sync at high speed with flash. Fuji X70 vs Ricoh GR II | MirrorLessons. The XF10 has more resolution which can give you more leeway for cropping, but we’ll be curious to see how it compares to the sharpness you can get with the GR. Given the popularity of the GR series, it comes as little surprise that Fujifilm has designed the XF10 to look very similar to the GR II.