There are 10 ISO settings available on the Sony A7 II. This seemed to be accurate in my testing, although I never really had to boost my ISO as high as I normally would due to the image stabilization. This new model features a new 24MP sensor that boasts 15 stops of dynamic range and ISO from 100-51,200 (expandable to 50-204,800). your camera’s software. The level of customization that is possible with the Sony A7 III is amazing. Sony a7 III + Sony … Both of these siblings produce very crisp images with excellent detail for ISO 1600, however both luma and chroma noise appear a little higher from the A7 III, and as mentioned previously, the revised area-specific noise reduction retains more fine detail in our red-leaf swatch. Now that we have the Sony A7 III though, we get some of the best features of the A9 for a fraction of the cost. The Sony A7 III has 3 different image quality settings available, with Extra Fine being the highest quality option. I've been shooting with the latest model, the Sony a7iii, at high ISOs to find out how well it performs in real … I also heard a lot about the Sony A7 III having a lower end EVF, but unless you are shooting it side by side with an Sony a7R III or Sony A9, you probably won’t even notice – the image in the EVF is plenty sharp and has no problem with its refresh rate. Not only did the camera focus faster, more accurately, and in lower light, but it also has something called Eye AF. Sony a7 III + Sony 85mm f/1.8 | 1/320 f/2.8 ISO100. Incredible autofocus and high ISO performance. Released five years after the original A7, the Sony A7III marks the third generation of Sony’s ‘entry’ level full-frame mirrorless camera series. Most of the time is people sitting by candle light, in front of a fire, or even the light from a cell phone. The Eastcore 205,658 views Using the Sony Carl Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 lens, I’m able to get a sharp image at 1/4th of a second handheld! The Sony A7III is now shipping. NOTE: These images are best quality JPEGs straight out of the camera, at default settings including noise reduction and using the camera's actual base ISO (not extended ISO settings). Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/2000 f/2.8 ISO100. It has a 1/250th sync speed and can shoot with manual, TTL, and HSS. [Ed – Check out the Godox AD200 review after reading this, and also my recommended accessories for Sony cameras!]. There are options that I’d never even thought about before, but now that I have them, it would be hard to go back. Another thing I found strange was just how long it took to format a memory card. For me, 24 MegaPixels is the perfect balance between having data to crop but not so much data that you have a huge giant file. Color from the Mark III also remains improved, giving the A7 III an overall win here. ... Sony warns that image quality deteriorates rapidly as the temperature of the camera rises. The Sony a7 III is an entry-level full-frame camera that goes well beyond the basics in features, with excellent image quality, 10fps subject tracking, and 4K video capture. That said, fine detail overall looks excellent and colors are nicely saturated, letting us easily print all the way up to 24 x 36 inches. As you can see, image quality here at ISO 100 is similar in most areas, however the Mark III does a much better job with fine detail in our tricky red-leaf swatch, resolving many of the individual threads that the A7 II blurs away as if noise. Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2020. My flash of choice is the Godox AD200, and if you haven’t seen this flash, do yourself a favor and look into it – it’s amazing! Here we can see the Sony A7 III resolves similar levels of detail with comparable noise levels, however Sony's sharpening is much more advanced producing a much crisper image with less noticeable sharpening haloes. The A7 III continues to produce a crisper, more contrasty and detailed image than the X-H1 here at ISO 3200. However, the Mark III leaves behind small areas with well-defined individual thread patterns while blurring other areas that results in a somewhat peppered look compared to the smoother but more blurred rendering of our trickly red-leaf fabric from the A7 II. Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/250 f/2.8 ISO 25600. Luma noise is a little higher from the Fuji, though chroma noise is practically non-existent. Looking at the two cameras, the Sony A7 III has an advantage over the Panasonic S5. Colors are a little more pumped from the Sony, however they are generally more accurate from the Canon. It's a similar story at ISO 800, which as expected shows ever-so-slightly more noise, but it's still so minimal and fine detail is still abundant that a 30 x 40-inch print is definitely acceptable at this ISO. Color is also a little more accurate from the Sony. Note that all these images have had absolutely no post production applied whatsoever, except for a slight bump in exposure (since I tend to shoot underexposed). Image Quality From our lab and real-world testing, we've found the Sony a7 III is capable of excellent image quality - with one or two exceptions. The image quality from the Sony A7 III is exactly what you have come to expect from Sony. If you have never seen Eye AF in action, it’s worth checking out. While this may be true when it comes to price, this is far from true when it comes to features. The largest size we print at is 30 x 40 inches, so up to ISO 800, you're really limited by how much you want to push the resolving power of the A7 III's 24-megapixel sensor. Sony 55mm F/1.8 starting. Overall, the Sony A7 III still comes out ahead here when viewed at 100% like this, but there is no denying the X-H1 does amazingly well for an APS-C camera. It'll be interesting to see how they compare at higher ISOs but there is a definite improvement here at base ISO. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture. All cameras in this comparison were shot with our very sharp reference lenses. Nothing close to being a deal breaker – I just found it strange and partially annoying. Obviously this is dependent on the ISO level you have dialed in though, so the higher you go in ISO, the more dialed in you need to have your exposure to where you want it in the final image, Sony a7 III + Sony 85mm f/1.8 | 1/4000 f/1.8 ISO100. At ISO 3200, the Sony A7R III produces a much cleaner, more contrasty image than the Canon, though the 5DS R's noise "grain" remains more consistent and natural-looking in flatter areas. It’s important to note that this is referring to compressed RAW images, which are a 12-bit file instead of 14-bit. Here are some 100% crops which show the quality of the various options, with the actual file size shown in brackets. Luma noise levels are indeed lower from the full-frame Sony, though less natural-looking noise reduction artifacts can be seen in flatter areas, and we still see aliasing artifacts in the red-leaf swatch. Sony a7 III RAW Samples | Editor’s Comment, Enables the possibility to operate the real-time EYE AF by half-pressing the shutter button, or by pressing the AF-ON button in AF-S and AF-C (there is no longer any need to hold down a custom key), Addition of the interval shooting function, Allows the operation with the wireless remote commander RMT-P1BT, Improves the overall stability of the camera. Unsurprisingly, the full-frame Sony A7 III out-performs the X-H1 here at ISO 1600, with a crisper, more detailed image overall, although moiré patterns and area/frequency-dependent noise reduction artifacts interfere with subtle detail in the red-leaf swatch. One other feature new to this round of A7 cameras is the addition of dual memory card slots, which is something that most working professionals place a lot of value on. The Sony A7 III is a small camera that packs a huge punch for a small price. So instead of having to remember when to turn it on as well as having to dive into the menu to do so, I put those amazing customizations on the Sony A7 III to good use. This is an impressive range of ISOs that all offer wonderfully large print sizes, despite the rise in sensitivity. Sony a7III – the camera is showing its age as EVF and rear screens improve; Video. Unsurprisingly, it's a similar story here as the A7 III clearly comes out ahead against the D500 at ISO 3200, with a much crisper, more detailed image. It happens so rarely it’s not a huge deal, but happens enough that I noticed it was doing something weird. Sony A7riii . Here at ISO 1600, the Sony still produces a much crisper image with better detail and lower noise, though its area-specific noise reduction does generate that pepper effect in the red-leaf fabric while moiré interferes with the leaf pattern much more than from the Nikon. Noise levels are higher from the Sony, though, and the "grain" pattern is a little less consistent and natural than the Canon's. The Best Value Full Frames: Sony A7iii … Much like Sony's flagship 24MP A9 mirrorless camera, the A7 III offers fantastic results with it comes to print quality. The A7 II does a bit better overall with our tricky red-leaf swatch as well as the pink fabric even though the Mark III still manages to hold onto at least some of the fine thread pattern in the red-leaf fabric. If you are considering switching for image quality improvements, get a realistic idea of how much the image quality may improve. However, a 20 x 30-inch print is probably usable with careful post processing or for less critical applications. There are things I wish could be fixed or added that will probably never happen, but even knowing that, I’m jumping all in and selling my Fuji and Nikon kit. The cameras in Sony's Alpha range are well-known for their superb sensors. The default in-camera JPEG processing of the A7 III creates a noticeably crisper and more detailed image which is particularly noticeable on the mosaic and fabric crops, though both cameras show obvious moiré patterns in red-leaf fabric. With all the nitpicking about buttons and menus out of the way, let’s dive into the heart of the A7 III: the photographs themselves. Autofocus. The only issue I had was every so often, something would lag and cause the EVF not to turn on when I put my eye up to the viewfinder. The products in this post may contain affiliate links. Here we compare the A7 III to the Nikon D750, an older full-frame 24-megapixel DSLR that currently sells for about $300 less than the Sony. Sony E-mount 35mm F/1.8. This means that if you are shooting with the camera set to write each image to both cards, the write speed will be bottle-necked by the slower card. Color is still more accurate and pleasing from the Canon, but overall the Sony easily comes out ahead here as we prefer to see a little noise with better detail retention versus a cleaner image which looks somewhat smeared. It’s pretty rare for me to need to capture fast moving subjects in low light. DxOMark Sensor Scores. ISO 1600 prints show very well-controlled noise, although it's subtly noticeable in shadows, and there is some very slight detail loss due to noise reduction. Last thing I want to talk about is the price.